The heuristics‑and‑biases framework, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, describes how people rely on mental shortcuts (heuristics) that enable fast judgments but systematically produce predictable errors (biases). These mechanisms reflect efficient but imperfect cognitive processing.
Availability is judging frequency or probability based on how easily examples come to mind.
Example: fearing plane crashes more than car accidents.
Representativeness is judging likelihood by similarity to a prototype.
Example: assuming a quiet person is “more likely” to be a librarian than a salesperson.
Anchoring occurs when initial numbers or cues disproportionately influence judgments.
Example: estimating a value near the first number presented.
Heuristics are adaptive, but their shortcuts create systematic distortions.
When estimating the probability of a rare event, people recall vivid examples (availability), adjust insufficiently from an initial number (anchoring), and match the scenario to a stereotype (representativeness), producing a biased judgment.
The heuristics‑and‑biases program reshaped cognitive science, revealing that human judgment is not purely logical but shaped by fast, intuitive processes. Understanding these mechanisms helps explain errors in finance, medicine, law, forecasting, and everyday reasoning.
Keywords: heuristics, biases, Kahneman, Tversky